[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Libcdio-devel] open(x, O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK) vs. O_RDONLY) on FreeBS
|
From: |
Steven M. Schultz |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Libcdio-devel] open(x, O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK) vs. O_RDONLY) on FreeBSD (Solaris, GNU/Linux)? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 8 May 2005 09:43:59 -0700 (PDT) |
On Sun, 8 May 2005, R. Bernstein wrote:
> Heiner suggested open(psz_device, O_RDONLY) and I notice on GNU/Linux
> the flags are O_RDONLY|NONBLOCK. If I have this correctly, Burkhard
Should that be O_NONBLOCK rather than simply NONBLOCK?
> Anyone have comments, suggestions, thoughts? Anyone want to venture
> what might be correct for FreeBSD, Solaris (BSDI, etc)?
BSDI uses "O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK".
Cheers,
Steven Schultz
- [Libcdio-devel] open(x, O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK) vs. O_RDONLY) on FreeBSD (Solaris, GNU/Linux)?, R. Bernstein, 2005/05/08
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] open(x, O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK) vs. O_RDONLY) on FreeBSD (Solaris, GNU/Linux)?,
Steven M. Schultz <=
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] open(x, O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK) vs. O_RDONLY) on FreeBSD (Solaris, GNU/Linux)?, R. Bernstein, 2005/05/08
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] open(x, O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK) vs. O_RDONLY) on FreeBSD (Solaris, GNU/Linux)?, Steven M. Schultz, 2005/05/08
- [Libcdio-devel] CDtext charset, Burkhard Plaum, 2005/05/09
- [Libcdio-devel] CDtext charset, R. Bernstein, 2005/05/09
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CDtext charset, Burkhard Plaum, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CDtext charset, R. Bernstein, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CDtext charset, Burkhard Plaum, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] open(x, O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK) vs. O_RDONLY) on FreeBSD (Solaris, GNU/Linux)?, Burkhard Plaum, 2005/05/09
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] open(x, O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK) vs. O_RDONLY) on FreeBSD (Solaris, GNU/Linux)?, R. Bernstein, 2005/05/09