[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Reviewing Hurd-on-L4 (and considering its future?)

From: arnuld
Subject: Re: Reviewing Hurd-on-L4 (and considering its future?)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 12:43:15 +0530

> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 2:32 PM, William ML Leslie <address@hidden> wrote:
> Rust is one option. But remember that the Hurd is not a kernel, it is
> user-space implementation of functionality that has typically lived in the
> kernel. For the sake of both security and ease of development, critical
> parts could be written in rust (or ATS, or Nim), and less critical parts in
> guile or so.

That is a brilliant idea William. Even I thought of either ATS or Rust
and using guile for rest.
It is more of like how Emacs was written. Lower parts in C and rest in
Emacs Lisp.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]