[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Broken dream of mine :(

From: Michal Suchanek
Subject: Re: Broken dream of mine :(
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:06:20 +0100

2009/11/4 Jonathan S. Shapiro <address@hidden>:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 3:39 AM, Michal Suchanek <address@hidden> wrote:

>> If there is practical security difference between the Coyotos model
>> and Viengoos model is yet to be proven. The same communication channel
>> exists in both and it's a matter of estimating and measuring the
>> bandwidth.
> I'm sorry, but that is incorrect. First, the corresponding channel
> does not exist, and second, Coyotos is a member of a family of
> architectures that have been running in production for over 35 years.
> The practical security of this family is very well demonstrated.

So it is practically proven that KeyOS or EROS are, in practice,
secure enough for some applications under some conditions.

This, however, cannot be proven for Coyotos because it does not exist.

And it gives no comparison to Viengoos, either. So the claim that
Viengoos is less secure than Coyotos is completely unbacked.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]