[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hurd/L4 active?

From: Richard Braun
Subject: Re: Hurd/L4 active?
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 15:03:38 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 02:14:10PM +0200, Martin Barth wrote:
> Hi,
> what can anyone do if he or she wants to help at the micro kernel thingie?
> Spending time for the mach-kernel seems not very clever, if mach is going to 
> be replaced.

I strongly disagree. The idea of Hurd-NG was born *because* we tried with
Mach. Improving the current Hurd is at least a way to find new problems
and think of their solutions before trying something else. In addition,
many other systems, like monolithic kernel based systems, have inherent
flaws. That doesn't prevent them from being used and working in most
cases. Why would it be different for the Hurd ?

Richard Braun

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]