[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reliability of RPC services
From: |
Pierre THIERRY |
Subject: |
Re: Reliability of RPC services |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Apr 2006 19:02:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 |
Scribit Marcus Brinkmann dies 25/04/2006 hora 18:41:
> It's true that the user probably can't really know when an operation
> is just taking long because the machine is busy, or because there is
> something botched. However, I believe that the user should always be
> in control, so if an operation is taking too long, and the user does
> want to abort the operation, he should have a chance to do so.
+1
I think that this should count as a very important design principle. The
system should never do something forcibly if the user could want the
contrary.
Freely,
Nowhere man
--
address@hidden
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Reliability of RPC services, Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/04/23
RE: Reliability of RPC services, Christopher Nelson, 2006/04/25
RE: Reliability of RPC services, Christopher Nelson, 2006/04/25
RE: Reliability of RPC services, Christopher Nelson, 2006/04/26
RE: Reliability of RPC services, Christopher Nelson, 2006/04/26
RE: Reliability of RPC services, Christopher Nelson, 2006/04/26