[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: No luck with libc compilation - missing l4/arch.h file (?)

From: Marcus Brinkmann
Subject: Re: No luck with libc compilation - missing l4/arch.h file (?)
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 14:26:12 +0100
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

At Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:55:44 +0100,
Bas Wijnen <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Sure.  If you really want to get us ahead of where we have already
> > been a zillion times though, it would be nice if you could work out
> > how to get proper "make install-header" targets with automake, so that
> > we can have a clean and proper bootstrap procedure without dirty tricks.
> > It can't be much that is required to get this working properly.
> Sounds good, but I don't know much about autotools.  Perhaps this is a
> good time to learn about them. :-)

Yes, indeed :)
> >>Also, there should be a
> >>note about linking the include and library files.
> >
> > I hope I have made sufficiently clear why there should not be such a note.
> Well, at the moment the absense of a note suggests that everything
> works.

You mean, like with the absence of source code? :) Mmh, there is
something true with that.  Code that doesn't exist can't be broken...


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]