[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: status of l4-hurd

From: Jeroen Dekkers
Subject: Re: status of l4-hurd
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 23:38:45 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.20i

On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 09:16:50PM +0200, Farid Hajji wrote:
> Yes, this is exactly what I'd like to do: Use separate libraries,
> where the Hurdish-stuff is in a OS-specific library. You're right,
> glibc is already modular in this sense. I wouldn't have been able
> to extract the sysdeps and combine them with FreeBSD's/OSKit's libc,
> if that were not already done ;-).

Why do we need to use oskit/freebsd libc instead of glibc? We need to
port them to L4 too, or do I miss something? IMHO porting glibc is the
same as porting those libc's and glibc is the libc of the GNU system,
already used now and for me the most obvious choice. Do I overlook

Jeroen Dekkers

Attachment: pgp4bTUld7_sO.pgp
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]