js-extensions-discussion
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: State of the Project


From: jahoti
Subject: Re: State of the Project
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2021 23:50:00 +0000



On 4/2/21 4:27 AM, Richard Stallman wrote:
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]


   > * WorldCat doesn't seem to have any critical issues with JavaScript
   > disabled. Could someone point out to me what needs to be addressed?

I saw this myself but it wasn't recently.  Perhaps the nonfree JS code
is a CAPTCHA you only get if you come in via Tor.

Thankfully there isn't such a CAPTCHA at present, at least one common enough that I've encountered it in four visits.

   > * Would https://github.com/berbaquero/reeddit be suitable for Reddit?

It describes itself as a "web-app client".  Is that another term for
the extensions we're discussing?  If not, how is it different?

Not exactly- it means it's a client (for Reddit) that runs as a single HTML page with some static scripts and stylesheets. That makes converting it into extensions as easy as adding a manifest and compressing everything.

However, I don't think it would be worth actually doing that except as a proof of concept. While old.reddit.com is still working there is little benefit to maintaining such an extension, and the fact that the old interface is popular but not the default suggests it will continue to work without JavaScript for the foreseeable future. As long as we remain sure the basis for an extension is available, that can be made into an active project whenever it becomes necessary.

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]