[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?
From: |
Brian Jones |
Subject: |
Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed? |
Date: |
31 Jan 2002 17:18:59 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 |
Nic Ferrier <address@hidden> writes:
> Therefore, if I may, I'd like to take the decision that we DO indent
> these decls.
I wasn't disagreeing with the indention, it's just that typically it
isn't required because the whole thing fits neatly on a single line
already. I guess something that throws multiple exceptions and
implements multiple interefaces will look like below?
public class foo
extends elmo
implements Bar,
Tom,
HenryInterface
throws BadDataException,
IllegalFormatError
{
...
--
Brian Jones <address@hidden>
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, (continued)
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Tom Tromey, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Brian Jones, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Nic Ferrier, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Per Bothner, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Nic Ferrier, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Per Bothner, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Nic Ferrier, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?,
Brian Jones <=
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Nic Ferrier, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Tom Tromey, 2002/01/31
Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Bryce McKinlay, 2002/01/31