[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Ring] Signature errors on rpm files
From: |
7l3c5w+wvrjcfh5f |
Subject: |
[Ring] Signature errors on rpm files |
Date: |
Wed, 03 May 2017 03:04:26 +0000 |
It seems there are rpm bugs which cause signing errors when using gpg V4
signatures.
Checking the signatures with gpg results in the following:
gpg --verify-files ring-daemon_x86_64.rpm
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
Package information produces the NOKEY warning:
rpm -qpi ring-daemon_x86_64.rpm
warning: ring-daemon_x86_64.rpm: Header V4 RSA/SHA512 Signature, key ID
75348f84: NOKEY
Name : ring-daemon
Version : 20170501.1.628969d
Release : 1.fc25
Architecture: x86_64
Install Date: (not installed)
Group : Applications/Internet
Size : 14299787
License : GPLv3
Signature : RSA/SHA512, Tue 02 May 2017 09:03:28 AM EDT, Key ID
64cd5fa175348f84
Source RPM : ring-20170501.1.628969d-1.fc25.src.rpm
Build Date : Tue 02 May 2017 09:03:07 AM EDT
Build Host : 9cb3e23fc473
Relocations : (not relocatable)
URL : https://ring.cx/
Summary : Free software for distributed and secured communication -
daemon
Description :
Ring is free software for universal communication which respects freedoms
and privacy of its users.
.
This package contains the Ring daemon: dring.
A web search gave me this link:
https://serverfault.com/questions/624888/bad-signatures-or-nokey-errors-on-rpms-i-just-signed,
and in it, this answer: gpg must use V3 RSA signatures to successfully sign an
rpm package.
----
Sent using Guerrillamail.com
Block or report abuse: https://www.guerrillamail.com//abuse/?a=U0h6Ai0HTaFbhxyz
- [Ring] Signature errors on rpm files,
7l3c5w+wvrjcfh5f <=