Re: s the cvs status always shows tags in ordered?

[Amaresh Chandra Das]

hi, 


Please use this, 

#!/bin/sh

patterns=( 
	'?' 
	'Locally Added'
	'Locally Modified' 
	)

for i in "address@hidden"
do
  cvs -Q status -R . | grep -i "$i"

use this link:- "http://www.freshblurbs.com/cvs-status-one-svn-bash-script"


done


Cheers   
Amaresh

 +91-9886720068

--- On Thu, 26/2/09, Michael Haggerty <address@hidden> wrote:
> From: Michael Haggerty <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: s the cvs status always shows tags in ordered?
> To: "Larry Jones" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "hezjing" <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> Date: Thursday, 26 February, 2009, 9:50 AM
>
> Larry Jones wrote:
>
> > hezjing writes:
> >> The output of cvs status -v .  looks like the following:
> > [...]
> >> Is the order of the tags guaranteed? That is the latest created tag
> will be
> >> displayed on top, and the oldest one displayed at the bottom?
>
> > 
> > No.
>
> That's unfortunate.
>
> In my experience, it seems to be that typically the ordering *is*
> preserved.  Indeed, we use this assumption to help the heuristics that
> choose symbol parents in cvs2svn; e.g., the decision of whether branch
>
> 1.5.2.7.4 was applied to branch 1.5.2 or 1.5.2.7.2 (or even 1.5.2.7.6,
> which can happen if branch 1.5.2.7.4 was created, deleted, then
> recreated).  Resolving this ambiguity is a big headache for cvs2svn and
> the apparent reverse-chronological ordering of symbols was one of the
>
> straws that I grasped at.
>
> Larry, do you know of specific situations where the symbol ordering is
> not preserved, or are you just reluctant to guarantee that it won't
> happen in the future?
>
> I would also like to encourage CVS developers *not* to disturb the
>
> ordering gratuitously :-)
>
> Michael


Thanks & Regards,

Hare Krishna.....
मन मेरा मंदिर हरी मेरी पूजा
हरी से बडा नही कोई दूजा

Amaresh Chandra Das
Mobile: 91-9886720068
Mail: address@hidden
         address@hidden

"Walk with a hope in your heart....you will never   walk alone"