[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Again: multiple vendors
From: |
Baurzhan Ismagulov |
Subject: |
Re: Again: multiple vendors |
Date: |
Sun, 6 Mar 2005 20:43:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:42:56AM +0000, Pierre Asselin wrote:
> Greg A. Woods <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Multiple vendor branches CANNOT work for what you want. Period.
>
> Maybe with the new "import -X" in cvs 1.12.x ? This was touched
> upon briefly in another thread.
Thanks for the link, I'll check this. Unfortunately, I can't do this for
the current project since we use 1.11.1 and the server is administered
by other people (I suppose one needs 1.12 both on the client and the
server side; please correct me if this isn't the case).
> The multiple vendor branch was not funny, so I agree with Greg.
> I had to manually reset many "admin -b" values, move files in and
> out of the Attic (I think), etc. When I got to the point where
> a plain trunk checkout gave me a current main-vendor release,
> I could start working.
Do I understand you correctly: it did work for you with import -b,
right? Do you mean it would be easier to do with normal branches,
applying upstream patches by hand and committing? In particular, I don't
see why you had to reset admin -b values and move files in / out of the
Attic; do you remember concrete scenarios?
With kind regards,
Baurzhan.
- Re: Long version numbers | Tedious to keep track, (continued)
- RE: Long version numbers | Tedious to keep track, Jim.Hyslop, 2005/03/02
- Re: Long version numbers | Tedious to keep track, Todd Denniston, 2005/03/02
- Again: multiple vendors (was: Re: Long version numbers | Tedious to keep track), Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2005/03/02
- Re: Again: multiple vendors, Greg A. Woods, 2005/03/03
- Re: Again: multiple vendors, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2005/03/03
- Re: Again: multiple vendors, Greg A. Woods, 2005/03/03
- Re: Again: multiple vendors, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2005/03/06
- Re: Again: multiple vendors, Kaz Kylheku, 2005/03/07
- Message not available
- Re: Again: multiple vendors, Pierre Asselin, 2005/03/03
- Re: Again: multiple vendors,
Baurzhan Ismagulov <=
- Message not available
- Re: Again: multiple vendors, Pierre Asselin, 2005/03/06
- Re: Again: multiple vendors, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2005/03/20
- Re: Again: multiple vendors, Larry Jones, 2005/03/04
- Re: Again: multiple vendors, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2005/03/06
Message not available
Re: Long version numbers | Tedious to keep track, Xapp, 2005/03/02