[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Bug is tagging the head of a branch head???
From: |
Fouts Christopher () |
Subject: |
Bug is tagging the head of a branch head??? |
Date: |
Tue, 18 May 2004 11:24:05 -0400 |
I have CVS v1.11.14.
I create a development branch of the HEAD.
I know the branch was created successfully since I can do a
cvs co -r b_dev_01_02, and cvs status -v on one of the files
and get...
File: file1 Status: Up-to-date
Working revision: 1.6 Tue Apr 13 21:27:40 2004
Repository revision: 1.6 /cvsroot/sample/dir1/file1,v
Sticky Tag: b_dev_01_02 (branch: 1.6.2)
Sticky Date: (none)
Sticky Options: (none)
Existing Tags:
b_dev_01_02 (branch: 1.6.2)
t_pre_dev_01_02 (revision: 1.6)
If I want to tag the head of a newly created branch (with no work
committed to it yet), I just do a
> cvs rtag -r b_dev_01_02 t_pre_dev_01_02_xx sample
correct? Straight forward enough, or so it seems. Now when I do
a checkout of the tagged files,
> cvs co -r t_pre_dev_01_02_xx sample
and do a cvs status -v on one of the files, it shows the tag sticking
to the HEAD revision, NOT the branch head revision.
File: file1 Status: Up-to-date
Working revision: 1.6 Tue Apr 13 21:27:40 2004
Repository revision: 1.6 /cvsroot/sample/dir1/file1,v
Sticky Tag: t_pre_dev_01_02_xx (revision: 1.6)
Sticky Date: (none)
Sticky Options: (none)
Existing Tags:
t_pre_dev_01_02_xx (revision: 1.6)
b_dev_01_02 (branch: 1.6.2)
t_pre_dev_01_02 (revision: 1.6)
Is this a bug???
--------------------------------------
Chris T Fouts
- Bug is tagging the head of a branch head???,
Fouts Christopher () <=