info-cvs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "<filename> created independently by second party"


From: Derek Robert Price
Subject: Re: "<filename> created independently by second party"
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 19:59:25 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Larry Jones wrote:

|Derek Robert Price writes:
|
|>1.  The files are likely to have a similar base given the similar name,
|>as has been the case nearly every time I have encountered this problem
|>myself, and we might be able to work out something with merging...  if
|>the diff between the two files is under a certain proportional size,
|>then the diff could probably usefully be inserted into the file between
|>merge markers for the user.
|
|
|So you're proposing doing a 2-way diff in that case?  As far as I know,
|the existing diff code always does 3-way diffs, so that would probably
|require quite a bit of infrastructure.


I don't have time to go through the whole man page tonight, but it seems
to me that diff's if-then-else format and the --*-group-format=FORMAT
options, if they can't implement the result we want exactly, should
require little hacking to persuade them to do so.

Nevermind.  Found the relevant option in diff's info page - it shouldn't
require any hacking at the diff source at all:

- --changed-group-format='<<<<<<<
%<
=======
%>
|>>>>>>'

Or something close to that.  Since the format specifier is just a
string, the revision or name of a file could be added to the string with
ease to match the other merge output formats.

Derek

- --
~                *8^)

Email: address@hidden

Get CVS support at <http://ximbiot.com>!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/hfZcLD1OTBfyMaQRAjl/AJ9QKtUxaxmBDd8LoNMOP32+l+TcbACgsMD1
SZ5tbg0aY43FytZye017MMk=
=lm86
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]