[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tag locking change
From: |
Greg A. Woods |
Subject: |
Re: Tag locking change |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 18:42:47 -0400 (EDT) |
[ On Monday, October 7, 2002 at 16:38:19 (-0400), Larry Jones wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Tag locking change
>
> Patwardhan, Rajesh writes:
> >
> > Would it be a safe workaround to use something like -D"10 minutes ago "
> > and assume that something currently being checked in will not be in the
> > tagging process initiated with a rtag.
> >
> > ( I am assuming I wait for 10 minutes after a proper file as needed by
> > me was checked in ).
>
> If you've got the files checked out, you should be using tag, not rtag.
If you're just creating a branch based on some other tag then I think
it's much more efficient to use 'cvs rtag -r BRANCH_BASE_POINT', at
least it seems to be if you're running directly on the repository server.
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098; <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
Planix, Inc. <address@hidden>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <address@hidden>
- Re: Tag locking change, (continued)
- Re: Tag locking change, Paul Sander, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Paul Sander, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Larry Jones, 2002/10/10
- Re: Tag locking change, Paul Sander, 2002/10/10
Re: Tag locking change, Larry Jones, 2002/10/07
Re: Tag locking change, Patwardhan, Rajesh, 2002/10/07
Re: Tag locking change, Paul Sander, 2002/10/07
Re: Tag locking change, Paul Sander, 2002/10/09
Re: Tag locking change, erik . cumps, 2002/10/10