[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: merge mode for XML
From: |
Sean Hager |
Subject: |
RE: merge mode for XML |
Date: |
Fri, 3 May 2002 14:49:11 -0500 |
> No. Not on extension, but based on *regular expressions*, or at least
> shell-style pattern matching expressions. Extensions are too
> simplistic. (c.f. CVSROOT/cvswrappers, CVSROOT/cvsignore)
Extensions would work fine, pattern matching is overkill.
> Yes. Some mechanisms like ~/.mime.types plus ~/.mailcap would be
> desirable. But one more complication would be the version of these
> external programs. Maybe, CVS needs to keep track of which version of
> the tools were used for which file revisions, so as to reliably and
> faithfully reproduce any snapshot.
This is a bit more overkill. Admins should test and make backups before
changing diff/merge programs during production. Even still, most updates in
diff/merge programs would be to fix bugs and would not dramatically change
the program functionality.
Sean.
- RE: merge mode for XML, (continued)
- RE: merge mode for XML, Glew, Andy, 2002/05/01
- Re: merge mode for XML, Lee Sau Dan, 2002/05/02
- Re: merge mode for XML, Lee Sau Dan, 2002/05/02
- Re: merge mode for XML, Lee Sau Dan, 2002/05/02
- RE: merge mode for XML,
Sean Hager <=
- RE: merge mode for XML, Greg A. Woods, 2002/05/03
- RE: merge mode for XML, Sean Hager, 2002/05/03
- RE: merge mode for XML, Noel Yap, 2002/05/04
- RE: merge mode for XML, Paul Sander, 2002/05/04
- RE: merge mode for XML, Noel Yap, 2002/05/04
- RE: merge mode for XML, Sean Hager, 2002/05/06
- RE: merge mode for XML, Noel Yap, 2002/05/06
- RE: merge mode for XML, Sean Hager, 2002/05/06
- RE: merge mode for XML, Noel Yap, 2002/05/06
- RE: merge mode for XML, Greg A. Woods, 2002/05/06