RE: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam i ssue: was: [GB2312] ±Ü Ãâåe ÎóµÄÍâÙQÐÐäN·½Ê

[Frederic Brehm]

> On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Beachey, Kendric wrote:
>
> >  Were it up to me, every message I ever write would be in plain old text, but
> >  our dad-blamed Exchange server insists on HTML-ifying my messages as it
> >  hands them to the outside world. 
>
> No worry. html posted from _subscribers_ would not be caught
> by Mailman, and so no moderation or elide-ment would occur.

That sounds reasonable to me. It sounds like all of the real content 
(and all of the flames!) will still get through. That's OK.

I vote YES to the proposed moderation.

If this starts up, I would be curious to see some statistics on the 
different types of messages trashed or delayed, at least for the 
first week or two. This is just curiosity so if it doesn't happen, 
it's no big deal.

Fred
--
Fred Brehm, Sarnoff Corporation, address@hidden
http://www.sarnoff.com/digital_video_informatics/vision_technology/index.asp