[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Abandoned CVS server processes
From: |
Dan Peterson |
Subject: |
Re: Abandoned CVS server processes |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Mar 2002 11:54:22 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time) |
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Larry Jones wrote:
> Dan Peterson writes:
> >
> > I've seen ESTABLISHED and IDLE.
>
> That's interesting, there is no official TCP state called IDLE. I
> wonder what it means? Certainly both states imply that the connection
> is alive and well as far as the system can determine.
I should clarify... the "TCP state" information was found by doing an lsof
on the process with a PPID of "inet". On the 3 open file descriptors
(stdin, stdout and stderr) which are tied to the socket, the "NAME" column
shows:
server:port->client:port (IDLE)
I assumed the value in '()'s was the TCP state.
Unfortunately I don't have any processes in this "spinning" state at the
moment, so I can't tell what netstat shows.
PS. I just looked at the man page for lsof and it does say the value in
parentheses is the "TCP or TPI state name".
- Abandoned CVS server processes, Dan Peterson, 2002/03/03
- Re: Abandoned CVS server processes, Stewart Brodie, 2002/03/04
- Re: Abandoned CVS server processes, Larry Jones, 2002/03/04
- Re: Abandoned CVS server processes, Dan Peterson, 2002/03/06
- Re: Abandoned CVS server processes, Larry Jones, 2002/03/07
- Re: Abandoned CVS server processes,
Dan Peterson <=
- CVS "Official" Releases, Dan Peterson, 2002/03/08
- Connection hijacking, Brian Smith, 2002/03/08
- Re: CVS "Official" Releases, Larry Jones, 2002/03/09
- Re: Abandoned CVS server processes, David Fuller, 2002/03/08
- Re: Abandoned CVS server processes, Larry Jones, 2002/03/08
- Re: Abandoned CVS server processes, Dan Peterson, 2002/03/14
- Re: Abandoned CVS server processes, Larry Jones, 2002/03/15