[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: deprecated caommand in

From: Greg A. Woods
Subject: RE: deprecated caommand in
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 17:03:47 -0400 (EDT)

[ On Tuesday, October 9, 2001 at 15:31:46 (-0400), Stanton, Curt (NCI/IMS) 
wrote: ]
> Subject: RE: deprecated caommand in
> First of all relax.  Second of all, I like a lot of things about CVS.  We
> would like to try to avoid problems right away by trying this way, which was
> already there in previous versions, until we are comfortable without it.  I
> was merely asking if there was a way to do it in the latest release, not
> asking anyone to spend time on something that the software isn't working
> towards

It really doesn't matter how much you like some features of CVS if you
don't like the "concurrent" part -- CVS was designed to force its users
into the concurrent (parallel) development model.  If you don't want to
do that then you do not want to use CVS.

Conversely If you really really really want to use CVS then you really
really really must get comfortable with the concurrent development

You might also want to look at other tools which allow concurrent
development but with a more controlled two-phase commit mechanism,
eg. Aegis.

                                                        Greg A. Woods

+1 416 218-0098      VE3TCP      <address@hidden>     <address@hidden>
Planix, Inc. <address@hidden>;   Secrets of the Weird <address@hidden>

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]