[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: killing a branch

From: Eric Siegerman
Subject: Re: killing a branch
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 16:22:58 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 12:18:23PM -0600, David Everly wrote:
> After I merge a branch into the trunk, I would like to make it so that
> people cannot commit to the branch anymore.  Would someone please suggest
> a good way of doing this?

Would it suffice to "cvs rm" everything on the branch, so that
when someone goes "cvs update -rbranch", they get nothing?

That wouldn't *prevent* someone from committing to the branch,
but it'd give them a pretty strong hint that doing so isn't what
they really want...


|  | /\
|-_|/  >   Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont.        address@hidden
|  |  /
The world has been attacked.  The world must respond ... [but] we must
be guided by a commitment to do what works in the long run, not by what
makes us feel better in the short run.
        - Jean Chr├ętien, Prime Minister of Canada

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]