Re: Correct options for export

[Larry Jones]

Ingolf Steinbach writes:
> 
> That is *one* aspect. But I fear that -- even if someone did provide a
> patch (+ ChangeLog entry + sanity test case + ...) -- there might quite
> a good chance that the time was wasted because it would be rejected.
> 
> Is there consensus among the developers with write access to the CVS source
> that the cases in which a file which was added with -kb needs to be checked
> out / updated / exported with keyword handling any other than -kb are so
> rare that a patch implementing the suggested change would be accepted?

I wouldn't reject such a patch out of hand.  I reguard the current
behavior as a bug, albeit one that isn't very high on my priority list.

-Larry Jones

They can make me do it, but they can't make me do it with dignity. -- Calvin