[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Future CVS Development
From: |
Derek R. Price |
Subject: |
Re: Future CVS Development |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:30:00 -0400 |
Noel L Yap wrote:
> >Now there's the rub... it requires patches to get advisory locks. I'm
> >talking about baseline CVS, as shipped out-of-the-box. And, the patches
> >aren't necessarily kept up-to-date with the latest CVS.
>
> Yes, I would very much love seeing these patches as part of CVS proper.
> They're
> missing test and toc patches (and another volunteer will need to submit
> these).
> Once these are in, the patches'll have a bigger chance of being included.
Not counting any code/tests anybody decides to nitpick, they'd probably have a
pretty good chance. I haven't heard any rumblings in response to my repeated
threats to include the changes in the main tree if they came with doc,
ChangeLogs,
and tests.
Derek
--
Derek Price CVS Solutions Architect ( http://CVSHome.org )
mailto:address@hidden CollabNet ( http://collab.net )
--
Life in a vacuum sucks.
- Future CVS Development, Kostur, Andre, 2001/06/18
- Re: Future CVS Development, Noel L Yap, 2001/06/18
- RE: Future CVS Development, Kostur, Andre, 2001/06/18
- RE: Future CVS Development, Noel L Yap, 2001/06/18
- Re: Future CVS Development,
Derek R. Price <=
- RE: Future CVS Development, Kostur, Andre, 2001/06/18
- RE: Future CVS Development, Kostur, Andre, 2001/06/19
- Re: Future CVS Development, Alexander Kamilewicz, 2001/06/20
RE: Future CVS Development, Noel L Yap, 2001/06/19