[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Use of CVS on large scales
From: |
John Minnihan |
Subject: |
Re: Use of CVS on large scales |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Jun 2001 13:13:52 -0700 |
address@hidden wrote:
> >CVS' transitory file locking (the # files that get left hanging around after
> >a
> >transient network blip) occurs during commit only (right Larry or Derek?),
> >and
> >thus would be a factor if and only if all developers were attempting to
> >commit
> >to the same file at the same time.
>
> Nope. Read locks are placed in the repository to prevent concurrent write
> locks from being created. If a read lock is left abandoned, then subsequent
> commits are disallowed. If a write lock is left behind, all access is lost
> to that directory.
Thanks for the correction, which was also provided by donald.
jbminn
- Use of CVS on large scales, Lucas Chan, 2001/06/07
- Re: Use of CVS on large scales, John Minnihan, 2001/06/07
- Re: Use of CVS on large scales, Mike Castle, 2001/06/07
- Re: Use of CVS on large scales, Jim Ray, 2001/06/08
- Re: Use of CVS on large scales, Donald Sharp, 2001/06/08
- Re: Use of CVS on large scales, Bob Bowen, 2001/06/11
- Re: Use of CVS on large scales, Greg A. Woods, 2001/06/12
Re: Use of CVS on large scales, Greg A. Woods, 2001/06/08
- Re: Use of CVS on large scales, Ralph Mack, 2001/06/08
- RE: Use of CVS on large scales, Kostur, Andre, 2001/06/08
- RE: Use of CVS on large scales, Pyatt, Scott, 2001/06/08
- Re: Use of CVS on large scales, Ralph Mack, 2001/06/08
- RE: Use of CVS on large scales, Teala Spitzbarth, 2001/06/09