[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal to fix CVS binary file implementation
From: |
Derek R. Price |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal to fix CVS binary file implementation |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Jan 2001 09:21:33 -0500 |
Paul Sander wrote:
> >--- Forwarded mail from address@hidden
>
> >Paul Sander wrote:
>
> >> Oh yeah, there's that problem where different versions might contain
> >> different types of data. Again, files containing different types of
> >> data should have different version histories. Unfortunately, CVS in
> >> its current form requires a unique mapping between version histories
> >> and working files, so people use it improperly because they have no
> >> alternative that meets more pressing requirements.
>
> >There is the example of, say, GIF to JPEG. That could be considered
> >mergable with
> >a proper tool.
>
> In that case, create a generic "graphic" type that you can use to store
> either GIF or JPEG images, and invoke the proper merge tool.
You'd get more flexibility from the system that allows arbitrary data types.
Then a
plugin or an application can register with merge types it can handle. e.g.
"GIF,
JPEG", "GIF, GIF", & "BMP, GIF", ... (of course a more succinct syntax is
probably
desireable, e.g. "[GIF,JPEG,BMP],[GIF,JPEG,BMP]->[JPEG,BMP]"). Another
application
could then register with types including PNG, JPEG, and BMP, w/o GIF and the
user
could be offered a choice when two applications were found that could handle a
merge.
Using existing Mime types &/or extensions is probably best.
Derek
--
Derek Price CVS Solutions Architect ( http://CVSHome.org )
mailto:address@hidden OpenAvenue ( http://OpenAvenue.com )
--
I will return the seeing-eye dog.
I will return the seeing-eye dog.
I will return the seeing-eye dog...
- Bart Simpson on chalkboard, _The Simpsons_
- Re: Proposal to fix CVS binary file implementation,
Derek R. Price <=