[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Getting the control port from a translator
From: |
Neal H Walfield |
Subject: |
Re: Getting the control port from a translator |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Jun 2001 21:10:56 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.18i |
> It's more important to me that all the kinds of permission checking be
> centralized into a small number of spots all in fshelp, than what the
> actual policy is (because it's easy to change it later in just one place).
Ok.
> I'm sure you didn't suggest the name "fshelp_iscontroler" before, because I
> surely would have insisted at least that you call it "fshelp_iscontroller"
> instead.
In fact, you are correct.
I forgot to include reference to this message:
http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/bug-hurd/2001-April/004134.html, where I
suggest that there is no difference between fshelp_isowner and
fshelp_iscontroller. Comments?
pgpPLRJKSlvjX.pgp
Description: PGP signature