[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface
From: |
Roland McGrath |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface |
Date: |
Sat, 2 Jun 2001 19:43:19 -0400 (EDT) |
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 05:45:09PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > I see. In that case, your earlier idea of mapping keys to symlinks
> > and ids to file names seems appropriate.
>
> How about stat information (e.g. attach time, detach time, etc)?
Please be specific (lists that are specific don't include "etc") and give
the details about what concerns you. Firstly, I haven't read the full
spec. More importantly, I don't consider whatever SysV spec there is for
shm to be intrinsically worth implementing for its own sake for the sake of
conformance per se (to some single-vendor so-called "standard"). So it
matters to know what the real-world uses of some particular feature are
before caring about it.