[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [help-texinfo] <title> in multi-node HTML

From: Gavin Smith
Subject: Re: [help-texinfo] <title> in multi-node HTML
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 17:26:29 +0000

I understand the issue now. I had not seen the screenshots you sent. It seems like a good idea to change it but I'd like to look into the issue more.

On Wed, 21 Nov 2018, 21:20 Akim Demaille <address@hidden wrote:
Hi Gavin!

Sorry for the delays…

> Le 12 nov. 2018 à 21:28, Gavin Smith <address@hidden> a écrit :
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 06:41:02PM +0100, Akim Demaille wrote:
>> Hi!
>> I was searching about conflicts in Bison on the web, and saw this:
>> « Understanding » is quite not a nice title, so I clicked to check, and got this:
> Where did you see « Understanding »?

I saw it on the Google’s page, as was represented in the screen capture I sent.  Right now, on « bison conflicts », I get:

Understanding (Bison 3.2.1) -
As documented elsewhere (see The Bison Parser Algorithm) Bison parsers are ... useless: STR; ^^^^^^^ calc.y: warning: 7 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr].

>> Is there a means to use the section name rather that the node name in the generated HTML?  It???s quite common to have a very short node name, but a fully blown section name, so the latter seems more appropriate to me.
>> Even in Texinfo???s own documentation, you have for instance the title « One argument », which hardly makes sense alone:
>> but the page is
>> 6.4.1 @xref with One Argument
> The URL of the page has to follow the node name so that other pages can
> link to it.

Sorry for not being clear: I was not referring in any way to the URL, I’m talking about the <title></title> of the page.

> I see on
> the link to the page is labelled "One argument" - is that the kind of
> thing you think could change?
> There is the "@xrefautomaticsectiontitle on" option, which may give some
> of what you are looking for.

That’s a nice feature I was unaware of, thanks!  But that’s not my point.  I’m claiming that the name of the section would be a better <title> than the node name.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]