[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Network Communications Information Missing From Docs
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: Network Communications Information Missing From Docs |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Jan 2021 16:27:27 +0100 (CET) |
I'm not knowledgeable enough but I would be inclined to have a new 3.2.6
version,
with as little major changes as possible but still with useful fixes.
Basically for me on Solaris, the 3.2.5 and the 3.2.91 work.
I've compiled with some GCC versions like gcc 7 and gcc 9 and gcc 10.
But I worry about the NEWS file which says that all socket code is going to be
rewritten.
Obviously I don't want that. I mean, it could be useful to have a new
implementation,
but at the same time it is important to maintain the old code.
So it would be nice if a new 3.2.6 release were to be made.
Optionally with also in parallel a new 3.3 release perhaps with more
significant changes.
Is the current 3.2.91 close to what 3.3 is possibly intented to be ?
Or is the current 3.2.91 more like a 3.2.6 release which is still very
different from what 3.3 would be ?
Anyway I think GNU smalltalk is a nice package, and
I'd like to express thanks for all of the work that is being done on it,
by the GNU smalltalk team ...
Regards,
David Stes
----- Op 7 jan 2021 om 14:25 schreef Holger Freyther holger@freyther.de:
> For 3.3 I had hoped to solve the deadlock we experienced in the VisualGST
> debugger with the new event loop. GTK+-2.0 stopped getting maintained and I
> think we should release 3.3 as is...
>
> What do you think?
> holger
>
>> On 6. Jan 2021, at 04:02, stes@PANDORA.BE <stes@telenet.be> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'm sorry if this is off-topic, but it seems relevant to GNU smalltalk.
>>
>> In the NEWS file in the 3.2.91 I read
>>
>> "The socket code will be rewritten (for all platforms) for 3.3 anyway."
>>
>> So I'd like to inquire about GNU Smalltalk 3.3 ... or perhaps a 3.2.6 in the
>> 3.2 series ??
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> ----- Op 5 jan 2021 om 20:12 schreef help-smalltalk help-smalltalk@gnu.org:
>>
>>> Paolo Bonzini writes:
>>>>
>>> All hail Paolo, the return of the king!
>>>
>>> Derek