Fwd: [Help-smalltalk] Iliad: a stupid question about "stateful"

[Bèrto ëd Sèra]

one more case of wrong button... gotta drink more coffee...


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bèrto ëd Sèra <address@hidden>
Date: 2009/7/30
Subject: Re: [Help-smalltalk] Iliad: a stupid question about "stateful"
To: Stefan Schmiedl <address@hidden>


Hi!

> How would the sitemap be organized?
Our "links" (actually paths, in Iliad terms) are the word itself, in
its original script (well, when it's a standard unicode script, we
won't export private codepoints, as per American Sign Language).
Pretty much like a wikipedia link. This is important, because engines
give a bonus to pages that have the term directly in the address. In
the end it will be something like "Iliad-sitemap". There is a good
sitemapping module in Drupal, I pretty much plan to do the basic
things it does. In the app specific side I'll have the added
possibility of deciding what to add in the meta info, like tags etc.,
but that's absolutely app-specific and cannot be included in a generic
high-level.

> the application base path
> to a view method will not work immediately.
Wait... so that means that maybe a REWRITE rule WOULD do the trick,
after all. What if the link www.example.org/словарь/земля rewrites to
www.example.org/interpret?перевод/земля? This would mean looking up
the first part of the command (перевод = translation), and at that
point you are done. You simply search the thing in the db an pull it
out.

Much in the same way you'd find that
www.example.org/заглавная_страница, www.example.org/intrada,
www.example.org/accueil all need to be understood as /index. You are
left with the problem of deciding which is which if and when two
languages use the same label to indentify 'index', but you can well
include in your localization software something that will signal to
people that their label is already assigned, so they can choose
another.

Would that do?

> I don't think that it will be an insurmountable problem. You just
> have to do it. It will be a nice addition to Iliad, when we found
> something that works :-)

Well, we are trying, aren't we? :)

Berto

--
==============================
Constitution du 24 juin 1793 - Article 35. - Quand le gouvernement
viole les droits du peuple, l'insurrection est, pour le peuple et pour
chaque portion du peuple, le plus sacré des droits et le plus
indispensable des devoirs.



-- 
==============================
Constitution du 24 juin 1793 - Article 35. - Quand le gouvernement
viole les droits du peuple, l'insurrection est, pour le peuple et pour
chaque portion du peuple, le plus sacré des droits et le plus
indispensable des devoirs.