[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug libstdc++/14493] No std::bad_alloc::what() const

From: gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/14493] No std::bad_alloc::what() const
Date: 11 Mar 2004 10:05:49 -0000

------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net  
2004-03-11 10:05 -------
Subject: Re:  No std::bad_alloc::what() const

"pme at gcc dot gnu dot org" <address@hidden> writes:

| >  Especially compared to "bad allocation"?
| Sure, we could change that.  I don't think "bad allocation" is any
| better than the demangled type name, but we shouldn't be printing
| a mangled typeid.  Others felt differently.

I agree with Phil that we should not have been printing the mangled

-- Gaby


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]