Re: datetick, reason for explicitly undocumented behavior?

[Julien Bect]

Le 01/01/2017 à 20:48, siko1056 a écrit :
> Jonathan Suever wrote
> > It's worth noting that the OP was using the second example on the online
> > documentation
> > <https://octave.sourceforge.io/octave/function/datetick.html>
> > as a guide which also incorrectly transposes the first two inputs. I have
> > submitted a bug report to the bug tracker
> > <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?49954>.
> >
> > I'm more than happy to help fix this documentation error if someone can
> > point me towards the best way to contribute changes towards the online
> > documentation.
> >
> > -Jonathan
> As explained in the bug tracker [1] the change of the online documentation
> [2] (actually it is a documentation maintained by Octave forge, the official
> Octave documentation for the latest release is found at [3]) depends on a
> page update by Carnë.

Kai,

I have just checked: I have r/w access on these pages (but perhaps all 
OF developpers have ?).

Generating the documentation should be as simple as a call to 
generate_html_manual... (@Carnë: is there anything else to do ?).

I will try to do it tomorrow.

@++
Julien