Re: Any interest in a Human Response to Vibration package?

[Terry Duell]

On Wed, 06 Aug 2014 23:41:19 +1000, Damian Harty  
<address@hidden> wrote:


> > Surely new packages are always welcome, I'm not actually sure what HRV  
> > Analysis is, but can it hurt to have it?
>
> HRV=Human Response to Vibration, like in the subject line.
>
> "Surely it can't hurt to have it" is what leads to bloatware, confusion  
> and errors. Look around at all the different FFT implementations for an  
> abject lesson in software muddle, then study the Mars Climate Orbiter  
> for what happens when people get complacent with complex software. In my  
> opinion, your mileage may vary, etc.

I'm a bit reluctant to go through the effort of sorting out a package for  
this if there really isn't any use for it.

> Anyway, Terry sharpened his comments up to suggest a dedicated ISO2631  
> package, which gets round all of my cautions. So now I'm all for it, and  
> will help however I can.

I'm currently looking at my code to see how it can be 'cleaned up'.

Cheers,
--
Regards,
Terry Duell