[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Octave
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
Re: Octave |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Apr 2014 17:36:12 -0400 |
On Apr 13, 2014, at 5:29 PM, c. <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 13 Apr 2014, at 23:09, Sergei Steshenko <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> I don't know what it means from Octave developers point of view though.
>
> it means that the output is not assigned if nargout = 0.
>
>
> It seems to me that the fix is trivial, as the documentation says
> that only one output value is assigned in any case, it would probably
> be sufficient to change line 719 of libinterp/corefcn/input.cc from
>
> retval = eval_string (input_buf, true, parse_status, nargout);
>
> to
>
> retval = eval_string (input_buf, true, parse_status);
>
> please add this suggestion to the report when reporting the bug.
>
> c.
I opened a bug report.
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?42111
Ben
- Octave, eugenio.pariani, 2014/04/13