Re: mpi 1.1.1 released

[Sukanta Basu]

On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 5:05 PM, c. <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 6 Jan 2014, at 22:34, Michael Creel <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> Is this new strategy robust to changes in Octave's internal data types? I 
>> think that Riccardo's strategy was influenced by a desire to make it easy to 
>> maintain the package so that any Octave object could be sent, and so that if 
>> Octave added or changed the structure of objects, it would be easy to keep 
>> up with. I don't know much about this, though, so perhaps I'm way off the 
>> mark.
>> Best,
>> M.
>
> Michael,
> AFAICS there's not much difference with that respect in the new strategy,
> I was just wondering whether it could have any sort of a performance hit ...
> c.

Carlo,

I tested MATLES with revised version of mpi package (Cray CX1, ubuntu
13.04, octave 3.6.4, openmpi). I am happy to say that there is no
memory leak. There is also no (negative) impact on computational
speed. From my perspective, the memory leak issue is fully resolved.

Thanks again for your help and support.

Best regards,
Sukanta

-- 
Sukanta Basu
Associate Professor
North Carolina State University
http://www4.ncsu.edu/~sbasu5/