[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: octave + mkl
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: octave + mkl |
Date: |
Wed, 16 May 2012 16:42:54 -0400 |
On 16 May 2012 16:28, Joshua Dillon <address@hidden> wrote:
> My *VERY* informal timing of MKL+octave shows it to be exactly the
> same speed as Matlab for "standard" operations like eig and eigs.
> Indeed, matlab uses MKL for these operations.
>
> %Octave 3.7.0+ w/MKL:
>>> X=rand(1000);
>>> tic;eig(X);toc
> Elapsed time is 0.967732 seconds.
>
> %Octave 3.2.4 w/o MKL:
>>> X=rand(1000);
>>> tic;eig(X);toc
> Elapsed time is 4.09906 seconds.
What 3.2.4 build are you using? Which BLAS, in particular?
- Jordi G. H.
- octave + mkl, Joshua Dillon, 2012/05/16
- Re: octave + mkl, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/05/16
- Re: octave + mkl,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=
- Re: octave + mkl, Francesco Potortì, 2012/05/16
- Re: octave + mkl, Joshua Dillon, 2012/05/16
- Re: octave + mkl, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/05/17
- Re: octave + mkl, Joshua Dillon, 2012/05/17