[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: matrix size for plotting ?
From: |
Christoph Ellenberger |
Subject: |
Re: matrix size for plotting ? |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:18:33 +0100 |
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 14:58:11 +0100
> Von: "Christoph Ellenberger" <address@hidden>
> An: Michael Goffioul <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> CC: address@hidden
> Betreff: Re: matrix size for plotting ?
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > Datum: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 13:06:24 +0000
> > Von: Michael Goffioul <address@hidden>
> > An: "Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso" <address@hidden>
> > CC: Christoph Ellenberger <address@hidden>,
> address@hidden
> > Betreff: Re: matrix size for plotting ?
>
> > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
> > <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > On 5 March 2012 05:24, Christoph Ellenberger <address@hidden>
> > > wrote:
> > >> I observe the following and wanted to know if this is intended or
> > >> how can I circumvent my problem (eg increasing memory).
> > > [snip]
> > >> QtHandles and fltk crash for imagesc already for X>=14, while
> > >> gnuplot crashes for X>=16.
> > >
> > > No, a crash is never intended. Please file a bug report.
> > >
> > > http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/bugs.html
> >
> > I tried the VS2010 version on an Atom N270 (500MB RAM) and the imagesc
> > sample didn't crash with X=14 or X=16. It took ages (and filled up RAM
> > and swap) to render X=16 case, but that's expected. The OpenGL
> > renderer is inefficient poor at rendering images.
> >
> > Michael.
>
> I do have a i5 CPU 750 (2.66GHz) with 3.4 GB RAM so it shouldnt be a cause
> of to low RAM. But when using the debug button I end up at an access
> violation of ATIOGLXX.dll (I do have a Raedon HD 4650). It might be that since
> this is a "downgraded" Win7 PC to XP that the driver may be faulty. I will
> try an driver update and report later.
>
> thanks
> christoph
>
> PS I will wait for sending a bug report until it is a real bug then [it
> rather looks as I have a misconfigured PC]
--
Ok after eliminating ATI's OpenGL I am able to plot up to X=16, X=17 freezes
gnuplot, QThandles throws an exception it can't handle (crash) and fltk gives a
memory exhausted or size too large for range of octave's index type. So I guess
indexes are only up to int16 for this kind of plot.
Thanks
christoph
PS btw thank you also for the 3.6.x windows versions.
--
Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de