[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Da Coda Al Fine matpow example in c++ not faster than octave
|
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
|
Subject: |
Re: Da Coda Al Fine matpow example in c++ not faster than octave |
|
Date: |
Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:12:25 -0500 |
On 22 September 2011 02:05, Fernando <address@hidden> wrote:
> I implemented the matpow example in Da Coda Al Fine documentation
> and execution time of both c++ and octave are more a less the same.
Da Coda Al Fine is a little old. Octave's manual itself has some
advice on writing oct files that is more up to date:
http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/doc/interpreter/Dynamically-Linked-Functions.html#Dynamically-Linked-Functions
But there are several versions of matpow in Da Coda Al Fine both in
C++ and in m-scripts. Which two versions are you comparing?
HTH,
- Jordi G. H.