Re: lsode example: different info results?

[Richard O. Legendi]

Ahh, now I see it, thx!

Sorry, I sticked with the first documentation I found in Google, thanks 
for the clarification, now it works!

Best regards,
Richard

On 2010.12.13. 13:16, c. wrote:
> On 13 Dec 2010, at 13:05, Richard O. Legendi wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would ask another question about the `fsolve()` function. I tried to
> > execute the following example found in the Octave manual:
> >
> >         http://sunsite.univie.ac.at/textbooks/octave/octave_19.html
>
> Why are you looking at that page rather than at the official octave manual:
> http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/doc/interpreter/Nonlinear-Equations.html#Nonlinear-Equations
> ?
>
> > It says that I should get `info = 1` as a result. However, when I
> > execute the statements I get the following (different) result:
> >
> > octave:1>  function y = f (x)
> > >   y(1) = -2*x(1)^2 + 3*x(1)*x(2)   + 4*sin(x(2)) - 6;
> > >   y(2) =  3*x(1)^2 - 2*x(1)*x(2)^2 + 3*cos(x(1)) + 4;
> > > endfunction
> > octave:2>  [x, info] = fsolve ("f", [1; 2])
>
> The manual you are looking at refers to a VERY old version of Octave (2.0.13, 
> that's from about 13 years ago!! and it was not even an official stable 
> release!!) which is most likely not the one you have installed.
> The manual for 3.2.4 I linked above describes the new calling sequaence:
>
> [x, fvec, info] = fsolve ("f", [1; 2])
>
> HTH,
> c.