[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Octave and databases
From: |
fork |
Subject: |
Re: Octave and databases |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:41:06 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Martin Helm <martin <at> mhelm.de> writes:
> > And heavy and computing-intensive.
> >
> > Pascal
>
> Not at all, database access via java is as performant as access via native
> libraries.
I think a lot of people (myself included) view java as a redundant dependency
with licensing problems -- a headache with very little payoff. That is another
debate altogether, but I think it is important to have a non-java solution to
database problems. For me, it is a combination of system() and sed, but that
isn't exactly graceful either.
- Octave and databases, Pohlen, Timo, 2010/09/01
- Re: Octave and databases, Andy Buckle, 2010/09/01
- Re: Octave and databases, CdeMills, 2010/09/01
- Re: Octave and databases, Martin Helm, 2010/09/01
- Re: Octave and databases, CdeMills, 2010/09/01
- Re: Octave and databases, Martin Helm, 2010/09/01
- Re: Octave and databases,
fork <=
- Re: Octave and databases, Martin Helm, 2010/09/01
- Re: Octave and databases, fork, 2010/09/01
- Re: Octave and databases, David Grundberg, 2010/09/01
- Re: Octave and databases, Søren Hauberg, 2010/09/02
- Swig works (Re: Octave and databases), David Grundberg, 2010/09/08
- Re: Swig works (Re: Octave and databases), Xavier Delacour, 2010/09/08
- Re: Swig works (Re: Octave and databases), David Grundberg, 2010/09/08
- Re: Swig works (Re: Octave and databases), Xavier Delacour, 2010/09/08
- Re: Swig works (Re: Octave and databases), Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2010/09/08
- Re: Swig works (Re: Octave and databases), John W. Eaton, 2010/09/08