[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: longuest interleaved sequences
From: |
Judd Storrs |
Subject: |
Re: longuest interleaved sequences |
Date: |
Fri, 21 May 2010 14:51:08 -0400 |
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Jaroslav Hajek <address@hidden> wrote:
> Well, subsequence != contiguous subsequence. At least I think
> contiguity was not specified.
Well, "longest" seems to imply to a sense of optimality that "find an
example of a subsequence" doesn't. ;) Of course optimality is murky
with ties in any case.
--judd