[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: calling octave from C
From: |
Judd Storrs |
Subject: |
Re: calling octave from C |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:54:34 -0500 |
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Jaroslav Hajek <address@hidden> wrote:
> Still, David's position is probably in agreement with FSF's:
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#IfInterpreterIsGPL
>
> so if this is of real interest to you, I'd suggest you ask the FSF
How can forbidding non-GPL python files be justified while
simultaneously allowing use of non-GPL m-files? How does the GPL
choose to favor one interpreted language over another?
--judd
- Re: Pytave licensing, (continued)
- Re: Pytave licensing, David Grundberg, 2009/11/19
- Re: Pytave licensing, Ulrich Staudinger, 2009/11/19
- Re: Pytave licensing, David Grundberg, 2009/11/19
- Re: Pytave licensing, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/19
- Re: Pytave licensing, Judd Storrs, 2009/11/19
- Re: Pytave licensing, David Grundberg, 2009/11/20
- Re: Pytave licensing, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/20
- Re: Pytave licensing, Judd Storrs, 2009/11/20
- Re: Pytave licensing (was: Re: calling octave from C), Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/19
- Re: calling octave from C, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/19
- Re: calling octave from C,
Judd Storrs <=
- Re: calling octave from C, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/20
- Re: calling octave from C, Judd Storrs, 2009/11/20
- Re: calling octave from C, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/20
- Re: calling octave from C, Judd Storrs, 2009/11/20
- Re: calling octave from C, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/21
- Re: calling octave from C, David Grundberg, 2009/11/21
- Re: calling octave from C, Judd Storrs, 2009/11/21
- Re: calling octave from C, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/21
- Re: calling octave from C, Judd Storrs, 2009/11/21
- Re: calling octave from C, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/22