[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: calling octave from C
From: |
Judd Storrs |
Subject: |
Re: calling octave from C |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:57:52 -0500 |
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Judd Storrs <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 5:17 PM, David Grundberg <address@hidden> wrote:
>> I just want to add that any script importing Pytave must be licensed
>> under GNU GPLv3, since its linked to Pytave (and other GPL software as
>> Octave). Pytave isn't a proprietary loop-hole, to be concise.
>
> Well, that sucks considering the AFNI python scripts are GPLv2. Guess
> I get to keep it to myself.
Perhaps I was a little hasty here. Are you saying you can only use
GPLv3 licensed m-files with pytave?
--judd
- calling octave from C, Philipp Leser, 2009/11/18
- Re: calling octave from C, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/18
- Re: calling octave from C, John W. Eaton, 2009/11/18
- Re: calling octave from C, David Grundberg, 2009/11/18
- Re: calling octave from C, Judd Storrs, 2009/11/18
- Re: calling octave from C,
Judd Storrs <=
- Re: calling octave from C, Judd Storrs, 2009/11/18
- Pytave licensing (was: Re: calling octave from C), David Grundberg, 2009/11/19
- Re: Pytave licensing (was: Re: calling octave from C), Ulrich Staudinger, 2009/11/19
- Re: Pytave licensing, David Grundberg, 2009/11/19
- Re: Pytave licensing (was: Re: calling octave from C), Søren Hauberg, 2009/11/19
- Re: Pytave licensing, David Grundberg, 2009/11/19
- Re: Pytave licensing, Ulrich Staudinger, 2009/11/19
- Re: Pytave licensing, David Grundberg, 2009/11/19
- Re: Pytave licensing, Ulrich Staudinger, 2009/11/19
- Re: Pytave licensing, David Grundberg, 2009/11/19