[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: expfit vs harminv - which is faster/smaller ?
From: |
Francesco Potortì |
Subject: |
Re: expfit vs harminv - which is faster/smaller ? |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:18:10 +0100 |
>> By reading the docs, it seems to me that they use different methods,
>> are thought for different problems and require different inputs:
>> expfit requires you to give it a number of harmonics to find, while
>> harminv wants a range where to search for them.
>>
>> That said, I should make it clear that I have no experience
>> whatsoever with those methods.
>This is what I read in 'man harminv':
> -f nf Specify a lower bound nf on the number of spectral basis
> functions (defaults to 100), setting a lower bound on the number of
> modes to search for. This option is often a more convenient way to
> specify the number of basis functions than the -d option, above,
> which is why it is the default.
As far as I read, this is a lower bound on the search space. Expinv, on
the other hand, wants you to tell it exactly how many harmonic functions
it should find.
--
Francesco Potortì (ricercatore) Voice: +39 050 315 3058 (op.2111)
ISTI - Area della ricerca CNR Fax: +39 050 315 2040
via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa Email: address@hidden
(entrance 20, 1st floor, room C71) Web: http://fly.isti.cnr.it/
- expfit vs harminv - which is faster/smaller ?, Sergei Steshenko, 2008/12/15
- expfit vs harminv - which is faster/smaller ?, Sergei Steshenko, 2008/12/16
- Re: expfit vs harminv - which is faster/smaller ?, Francesco Potortì, 2008/12/16
- Re: expfit vs harminv - which is faster/smaller ?, Sergei Steshenko, 2008/12/16
- Re: expfit vs harminv - which is faster/smaller ?,
Francesco Potortì <=
- Re: expfit vs harminv - which is faster/smaller ?, Sergei Steshenko, 2008/12/16
- Re: expfit vs harminv - which is faster/smaller ?, Peter L., 2008/12/17
- Re: expfit vs harminv - which is faster/smaller ?, Sergei Steshenko, 2008/12/17
- Re: expfit vs harminv - which is faster/smaller ?, Peter L., 2008/12/19