[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Q: Re Qtoctave
From: |
Terry Duell |
Subject: |
Re: Q: Re Qtoctave |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:41:09 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Messenger-Pro/2.62 (MsgServe/2.05) (RISC-OS/4.39) POPstar/2.05 |
In message 25 Feb
"John W. Eaton" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 25-Feb-2008, Terry Duell wrote:
>
> | Hullo All,
> | I would like to try qtoctave, and went to the download page and found the
> | following binaries...
>
> What "download page"?
The qtoctave download page. See http://qtoctave.wordpress.com/what-is-qtoctave/
>
> | easy_plot-20080122.i386.rpm (5.25 MB)
> | qtoctave_0.68-1.i386.deb (1.49 MB)
> | qtoctave_0.7.1-1.i386.rpm (994 KB)
> | qtoctave-bin-linux-i386-0.6.7.tar.gz (5.14 MB)
> | qtoctave-bin-linux-i386-0.6.8.tar.gz (5.14 MB)
> |
> | I haven't been able to find any explanation on the site as whether all or
> | some or only one of these qtoctave binaries are needed.
> | Clearly one would only need the .deb or the .rpm, not both, but does one
> | also need one of the 'qtoctave-bin-linux' binaries as well? They all
> | seem to be different versions. Some clarification from someone who
> | knows would be appreciated.
>
> Maybe you should ask the qtoctave developers?
Maybe I should.
Sorry if the question offends, but as only an octave user would use qtoctave
and I subscribe to this list, I didn't think it an unreasonable question to
ask here. There has been discussion here about qtoctave in the past.
Cheers,
--
Regards,
Terry Duell