[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.1 branch vs. 2.9 branch
From: |
David Bateman |
Subject: |
Re: 2.1 branch vs. 2.9 branch |
Date: |
Sat, 04 Nov 2006 21:00:03 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060921) |
Quentin Spencer wrote:
> Ronald Crummett wrote:
>> Just a couple of general questions regarding the two dominant branches
>> of Octave:
>>
>> 1. What are some of the main differences/advantages between the 2.1
>> branch and the 2.9 branch?
>>
>
> Here's a quick list:
> 1. Sparse matrix support
> 2. Lots of octave-forge functions incorporated into octave
> 3. Changes in the graphics interface
> That's all I can think of now, maybe others can add to this.
64bit support
GLPK bindings
Reads matlab v7 files
Much better matlab compatiability
Lots, lots more...
D.