[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: puzzling Octave behaviour
From: |
Joan Picanyol i Puig |
Subject: |
Re: puzzling Octave behaviour |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Jul 2006 14:24:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
* Shai Ayal <address@hidden> [20060722 19:31]:
> 1. you show the same vectors arg(ltest(1:10)) twice -- is this what you
> meant?
Doh!! Oh well...
> 2. If you were to subtract the two vectors
> arg(ltmps(1:10))-arg(ltest(1:10)) I am sure you would see they differ by
> some thing in the order of magnitude of 1e-15. That's floating point for
> you..,
Yep, that's what I found.
Thank for getting me back to reason...
qvb
--
pica
- puzzling Octave behaviour, Joan Picanyol i Puig, 2006/07/22
- Re: puzzling Octave behaviour, Muthiah Annamalai, 2006/07/22
- Re: puzzling Octave behaviour, Tom Holroyd, 2006/07/22
- Re: puzzling Octave behaviour, Francesco Potorti`, 2006/07/24
- checking for tiny inequalities (was: Re: puzzling Octave behaviour), Joan Picanyol i Puig, 2006/07/24
- Re: checking for tiny inequalities (was: Re: puzzling Octave behaviour), Bill Denney, 2006/07/24
- Re: checking for tiny inequalities (was: Re: puzzling Octave behaviour), Przemek Klosowski, 2006/07/24
- Re: checking for tiny inequalities (was: Re: puzzling Octave behaviour), Francesco Potorti, 2006/07/24
- Re: checking for tiny inequalities (was: Re: puzzling Octave behaviour), Joan Picanyol i Puig, 2006/07/30