[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: possible bug
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: possible bug |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Feb 2006 16:31:46 -0500 |
On 23-Feb-2006, Gorazd Brumen wrote:
| I know that the question is maybe partially irrelevant, but
| hopefully clarifying. In
| what respect does this special whitespace feature removal
| "causes a lot more problems than it solves" - apart from
| compatibility?
If Octave interprets { x (i) } differently from Matlab, then you could
have code that runs without errors in both systems but produces
different results. I think that is enough of a reason to opt for
compatibility.
jwe
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- possible bug, Gorazd Brumen, 2006/02/23
- possible bug, John W. Eaton, 2006/02/23
- Re: possible bug, Gorazd Brumen, 2006/02/23
- Re: possible bug, John W. Eaton, 2006/02/23
- Re: possible bug, Gorazd Brumen, 2006/02/23
- Re: possible bug,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: possible bug, Steve C. Thompson, 2006/02/23
- Re: possible bug, Bill Denney, 2006/02/23
- Re: possible bug, John W. Eaton, 2006/02/28