[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: matching command
From: |
Mike Miller |
Subject: |
Re: matching command |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Dec 2005 18:04:55 -0600 (CST) |
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Stefan van der Walt wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 09:55:44PM +0200, Shai Ayal wrote:
I'm sure there are many other examples. IMHO Octave should strive to be
better than matlab, not just a clone
While I share your sentiments, I believe it's a design decision that's
been taken? Octave aims to be compatible with MATLAB, wherever
possible.
I think we should strive for "unidirectional compatibility" such that
Octave can run *any* MATLAB code (rendering MATLAB unnecessary) but MATLAB
might not be able to run all Octave code. This allows us to have both
compatibility and superiority.
Mike
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- matching command, roberto, 2005/12/15
- Re: matching command, Andy Pugh, 2005/12/15
- Re: matching command, David Bateman, 2005/12/15
- Re: matching command, William Poetra Yoga Hadisoeseno, 2005/12/15
- Re: matching command, Stefan van der Walt, 2005/12/15
- Re: matching command, Shai Ayal, 2005/12/15
- Re: matching command, Stefan van der Walt, 2005/12/15
- Re: matching command,
Mike Miller <=
- Re: matching command, William Poetra Yoga Hadisoeseno, 2005/12/15