[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question about Range class
From: |
Robert A. Macy |
Subject: |
Re: Question about Range class |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Nov 2005 21:06:14 -0800 |
It has been difficult for me to break the "for loop"
structure. Just so easy to think in sequential terms.
- Robert -
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:48:50 -0500
"John W. Eaton" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 22-Nov-2005, Robert A. Macy wrote:
>
> | Just curious, why is the order of the arguments...
> | Range r (0.0, 10.0, 0.1); // base, limit, increment
> | ...and not...
> | Range r (0.0, 0.1, 10.0); // base, increment, limit
> | ...to keep a similar order of arguments in octave's...
> | z = [ 0 : 0.1 : 10 ]
> | ...?
>
> Why not? It seemed more natural to me at the time.
> Probably I was
> still braindamaged by Fortran's DO loop syntax.
>
> jwe
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- Question about Range class, Marek Szczypinski, 2005/11/22
- Re: Question about Range class, Robert A. Macy, 2005/11/22
- Re: Question about Range class, John W. Eaton, 2005/11/22
- Re: Question about Range class, Pedro Antonio Fructuoso Merino, 2005/11/23
- Re: Question about Range class, Robert A. Macy, 2005/11/23
- Re: Question about Range class, Shai Ayal, 2005/11/24
- Re: Question about Range class, John W. Eaton, 2005/11/24
- Re: Question about Range class, Joe Koski, 2005/11/24
- Re: Question about Range class, Miroslaw Kwasniak, 2005/11/25
- Re: Question about Range class, Robert A. Macy, 2005/11/25
- Re: Question about Range class, Przemek Klosowski, 2005/11/25
- Re: Question about Range class, Robert A. Macy, 2005/11/25
- Re: Question about Range class, Henry F. Mollet, 2005/11/25