[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
imread / imwrite status?
From: |
Brendan Drew |
Subject: |
imread / imwrite status? |
Date: |
Fri, 09 Sep 2005 10:59:31 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) |
Appologies if this is going to the wrong list -- there's a maintainers
list but no devel list, which is where I'd usually send this sort of thing.
I am presently using Octave 2.1.64 (SuSE binaries) and Octave-Forget
2004.11.16. Looking through the release notes for Octave and
Octave-Forge, it appears that imread and imwrite (my bread and butter,
so to speak) are both implemented by forking off an ImageMagick
(convert) process. This gets to be intolerably slow when reading large
sequences of images (my C++ png reading / writing code is roughly a
factor of 10 faster on my system, which when you multiply out by 6000+
images is quite the savings). Are there any plans for a C++ version of
imread / imwrite? If not, I'd be happy to take a weekend or two to start
hacking one together if there is sufficient interest.
--
Brendan Drew
Research Scientist
PercepTek, Inc.
12395 North Mead Way
Littleton, CO 80125
Tel: 720-344-1037 x 126
Fax: 720-344-2360
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- imread / imwrite status?,
Brendan Drew <=